【09-10】Kees Jan van Groenigen: Exploring the limitations of soil carbon storage

发布时间:2019-09-04

 讲座题目:Exploring the limitations of soil carbon storage
 主 讲 人:Kees Jan van Groenigen (副教授 英国埃克塞特大学)
 主 持 人:周旭辉 (教授)
 开始时间:2019年9月10日 上午10:00
 讲座地址:闵行校区资环楼435室
 主办单位:生态与环境科学学院、科技处

 报告人简介:

Kees Jan van Groenigen

Dr. Kees Jan van Groenigen is a biogeochemist. Through his research,  he tries to understand how plants and soil respond to - and influence -  environmental change. He has studied carbon and nutrient cycles in a  wide range of ecosystems, including grasslands, cropland, temperate  forests and rice paddies. He often uses meta-analytic techniques to  synthesize findings in his field of research. He also studies the role  of soil microbes in carbon and nitrogen cycles, using techniques such as  incubation experiments, isotopic tracers and analyses of biomarkers. He  has been editor for a number of journals, such as Biogeosciences and  Plant and Soil. He has authored more than 60 publications, with total  citations of >4500. Most of his recent works have published in top  journals such as Nature, Science, Nature Climate Change, PNAS, Science  advance and Global Change Biology as first or corresponding author.


报告内容简介:

Stimulating soil carbon (C) storage in agricultural lands has been  proposed as an effective climate mitigation tool. However,  stoichiometric ratios between carbon (C), nitrogen (N) and phosphorus  (P) in soil organic matter (SOM) are essentially stable. This means that  soil C sequestration implies similar sequestration rates of N and P. I  will discuss several stoichiometric issues that seriously limit both the  feasibility and the effectiveness of stated soil C sequestrations  goals, i.e. the 4P1000 initiative. First, I will argue using basic  stoichiometric relations that successful implementation of 4P1000 would  require N equivalent to approximately 75% of current global fertilizer  production. Similar arguments could be made for other nutrients such as  P.  Second, I will show using data from the long-term experiments at  Rothamsted Research, as well as meta-analysis, that the C sequestration  potential of a soil is controlled by N supply and that initial  sequestration rates are not sustainable over the long term. Third, I  will present experimental data showing that increased nitrous oxide  emission in soils with more SOM may offset any benefits in terms of  greenhouse gas mitigation. Finally, I will argue for a more realistic  view of the role of soil organic matter in sustaining soil functions and  soil life, and advocate a diversified approach towards mitigating  global warming through soil management.